public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures
@ 2011-02-17 19:05 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-02-17 19:29 ` [Bug lto/47788] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-02-17 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
Summary: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
CC: hubicka@gcc.gnu.org
On Linux/x86, revision 170250 gave
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081115 c_lto_20081115_0.o-c_lto_20081115_2.o execute -O0
-flto -flto-partition=1to1
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081118 c_lto_20081118_0.o-c_lto_20081118_2.o execute -O0
-flto -flto-partition=1to1
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081201-1 c_lto_20081201-1_0.o-c_lto_20081201-1_2.o execute
-O0 -flto -flto-partition=1to1
Revision 170247 is OK. Revision 170249:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-02/msg00794.html
is the cause.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures
2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-02-17 19:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 20:29 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-17 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.02.17 19:05:04
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures
2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-02-17 19:29 ` [Bug lto/47788] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-18 20:29 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 20:54 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-18 20:20:50 UTC ---
It looks like another regression from this patch is that tmp-runtime.m in
libobjc fails -fcompare-debug when building runtime-info.h.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures
2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-02-17 19:29 ` [Bug lto/47788] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 20:29 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-18 20:54 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-19 3:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-18 20:44:52 UTC ---
Sorry, #c1 is a false alarm, git bisect pilot error. The failure is caused by
r170260.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures
2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-18 20:54 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-19 3:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-20 0:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-19 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-19 02:13:20 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Feb 19 02:13:17 2011
New Revision: 170300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170300
Log:
PR middle-end/47788
* ipa-inline.c (compute_inline_parameters): Clear disregard_inline_limits
when function is not inlinable at all.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ipa-inline.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures
2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-19 3:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-20 0:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-20 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-19 22:44:18 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures
2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-20 0:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-04 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-04 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-04 11:23:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 4 11:23:18 2012
New Revision: 192075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192075
Log:
2012-10-04 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR lto/47788
* tree-streamer-out.c (write_ts_block_tree_pointers): For
inlined functions outer scopes write the ultimate origin
as BLOCK_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN and BLOCK_SOURCE_LOCATION.
Do not stream the fragment chains.
* tree-streamer-in.c (lto_input_ts_block_tree_pointers): Likewise.
* dwarf2out.c (gen_subprogram_die): Handle NULL DECL_INITIAL.
(dwarf2out_decl): Always output DECL_ABSTRACT function decls.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c
trunk/gcc/tree-streamer-in.c
trunk/gcc/tree-streamer-out.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-04 11:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-02-17 19:29 ` [Bug lto/47788] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 20:29 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 20:54 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-19 3:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-20 0:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).