public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures @ 2011-02-17 19:05 hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-17 19:29 ` [Bug lto/47788] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ` (5 more replies) 0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-02-17 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 Summary: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com CC: hubicka@gcc.gnu.org On Linux/x86, revision 170250 gave FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081115 c_lto_20081115_0.o-c_lto_20081115_2.o execute -O0 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081118 c_lto_20081118_0.o-c_lto_20081118_2.o execute -O0 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081201-1 c_lto_20081201-1_0.o-c_lto_20081201-1_2.o execute -O0 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 Revision 170247 is OK. Revision 170249: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-02/msg00794.html is the cause. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures 2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-02-17 19:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 20:29 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-17 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2011.02.17 19:05:04 CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures 2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-17 19:29 ` [Bug lto/47788] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 20:29 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 20:54 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-18 20:20:50 UTC --- It looks like another regression from this patch is that tmp-runtime.m in libobjc fails -fcompare-debug when building runtime-info.h. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures 2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-17 19:29 ` [Bug lto/47788] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 20:29 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 20:54 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 3:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-18 20:44:52 UTC --- Sorry, #c1 is a false alarm, git bisect pilot error. The failure is caused by r170260. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures 2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2011-02-18 20:54 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-19 3:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 0:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-19 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-19 02:13:20 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Feb 19 02:13:17 2011 New Revision: 170300 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170300 Log: PR middle-end/47788 * ipa-inline.c (compute_inline_parameters): Clear disregard_inline_limits when function is not inlinable at all. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/ipa-inline.c ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures 2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2011-02-19 3:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-20 0:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-20 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-19 22:44:18 UTC --- Fixed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures 2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2011-02-20 0:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-04 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-04 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-04 11:23:23 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Oct 4 11:23:18 2012 New Revision: 192075 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192075 Log: 2012-10-04 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> PR lto/47788 * tree-streamer-out.c (write_ts_block_tree_pointers): For inlined functions outer scopes write the ultimate origin as BLOCK_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN and BLOCK_SOURCE_LOCATION. Do not stream the fragment chains. * tree-streamer-in.c (lto_input_ts_block_tree_pointers): Likewise. * dwarf2out.c (gen_subprogram_die): Handle NULL DECL_INITIAL. (dwarf2out_decl): Always output DECL_ABSTRACT function decls. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c trunk/gcc/tree-streamer-in.c trunk/gcc/tree-streamer-out.c ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-04 11:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-02-17 19:05 [Bug lto/47788] New: [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-17 19:29 ` [Bug lto/47788] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 20:29 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 20:54 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 3:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 0:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).