public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition
@ 2011-02-18 16:58 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/47803] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803
Summary: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER
definition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org
I think the following program could be valid. It came up in an IR and my
understanding is that following program is valid - while the version in the IR
is invalid. -- Given that all other compilers accept it, I think it should be
valid F95.
Cf. http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/11/11-101.txt - and look for updates
(11-101r1.txt etc.)
INTEGER PURE FUNCTION F1(I)
INTEGER :: A(int(1))
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: KIND = SIZE(A) ! KIND == 1
INTEGER(KIND), INTENT(IN) :: I
F1 = 17
END FUNCTION F1
ifort, g95, NAG f95, pathf95 compile the program but gfortran rejects it with:
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: KIND = SIZE(A) ! KIND == 1
1
Error: Array 'a' at (1) is a variable, which does not reduce to a constant
expression
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition
2011-02-18 16:58 [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-18 17:09 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-26 19:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-26 20:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-18 17:07:03 UTC ---
Forgot to link to http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2011-February/004197.html
which is about the J3 ballot of those items; it also contains an updated
version of the paper.
The IR has been approved by the J3 meeting and currently a J3 ballot is running
(cf. link); if accepted, it moves on to June's WG5 meeting in Garching.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition
2011-02-18 16:58 [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/47803] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-26 19:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-26 20:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-26 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition
2011-02-18 16:58 [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/47803] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-26 19:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-06-26 20:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-26 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> The link is broken. Any news from the committee about this PR?
Try: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2011-February/004197.html
That's F08/0050. See F2008 Corr. 1 at
ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1901-N1950/N1902.pdf (search for F08/0050).
See also ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1851-N1900/N1875.txt for the latest
version (positively balloted in N1877/N1889).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-26 20:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-18 16:58 [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/47803] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-26 19:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-26 20:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).