public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition @ 2011-02-18 16:58 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/47803] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 Summary: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org I think the following program could be valid. It came up in an IR and my understanding is that following program is valid - while the version in the IR is invalid. -- Given that all other compilers accept it, I think it should be valid F95. Cf. http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/11/11-101.txt - and look for updates (11-101r1.txt etc.) INTEGER PURE FUNCTION F1(I) INTEGER :: A(int(1)) INTEGER, PARAMETER :: KIND = SIZE(A) ! KIND == 1 INTEGER(KIND), INTENT(IN) :: I F1 = 17 END FUNCTION F1 ifort, g95, NAG f95, pathf95 compile the program but gfortran rejects it with: INTEGER, PARAMETER :: KIND = SIZE(A) ! KIND == 1 1 Error: Array 'a' at (1) is a variable, which does not reduce to a constant expression ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition 2011-02-18 16:58 [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 17:09 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 19:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-26 20:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-18 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-18 17:07:03 UTC --- Forgot to link to http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2011-February/004197.html which is about the J3 ballot of those items; it also contains an updated version of the paper. The IR has been approved by the J3 meeting and currently a J3 ballot is running (cf. link); if accepted, it moves on to June's WG5 meeting in Garching. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition 2011-02-18 16:58 [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/47803] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-26 19:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-26 20:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-26 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition 2011-02-18 16:58 [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/47803] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 19:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-26 20:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-26 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) > The link is broken. Any news from the committee about this PR? Try: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2011-February/004197.html That's F08/0050. See F2008 Corr. 1 at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1901-N1950/N1902.pdf (search for F08/0050). See also ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1851-N1900/N1875.txt for the latest version (positively balloted in N1877/N1889). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-26 20:06 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-02-18 16:58 [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/47803] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 19:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-26 20:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).