public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/47803] New: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:58:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-47803-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 Summary: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org I think the following program could be valid. It came up in an IR and my understanding is that following program is valid - while the version in the IR is invalid. -- Given that all other compilers accept it, I think it should be valid F95. Cf. http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/11/11-101.txt - and look for updates (11-101r1.txt etc.) INTEGER PURE FUNCTION F1(I) INTEGER :: A(int(1)) INTEGER, PARAMETER :: KIND = SIZE(A) ! KIND == 1 INTEGER(KIND), INTENT(IN) :: I F1 = 17 END FUNCTION F1 ifort, g95, NAG f95, pathf95 compile the program but gfortran rejects it with: INTEGER, PARAMETER :: KIND = SIZE(A) ! KIND == 1 1 Error: Array 'a' at (1) is a variable, which does not reduce to a constant expression
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-18 16:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-02-18 16:58 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2011-02-18 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/47803] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 19:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-26 20:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-47803-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).