From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-349326-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2429 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 16:58:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 2416 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 16:58:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_DX
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:58:23 +0000
From: "xinliangli at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xinliangli at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-47837-4-4BszbSQzOV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47837-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47837-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:58:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00639.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D47837

--- Comment #13 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-03-07 16:58=
:03 UTC ---
Yes -- I also wanted to do the generalization.

David

(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Please verify the patch on hpux and os390.
>=20
> Perhaps you could enhance your patch to cover then uninit-pred-8_a.c case=
 as
> well. It looks quite similiar:
>=20
> /build3/gcc-head-build/gcc/xgcc -B/build3/gcc-head-build/gcc/
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c   -Wuninitialized=
 -O2
> -S  -o uninit-pred-8_a.s
>=20
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c: In function =E2=
=80=98foo=E2=80=99:
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c:26:11: warning: =
=E2=80=98v=E2=80=99 may
> be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c: In function =E2=
=80=98foo_2=E2=80=99:
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c:42:11: warning: =
=E2=80=98v=E2=80=99 may
> be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
>=20
> As well as with uninit-pred-7_a.c the first warning is unexpected.