* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-03 12:43 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-03 17:32 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-03 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 |hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20,
| |s390x-ibm-linux
CC| |krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Host|hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 |hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20,
| |s390x-ibm-linux
Build|hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 |hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20,
| |s390x-ibm-linux
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-03 12:43:34 UTC ---
I see the same on s390x.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-03 12:43 ` [Bug c/47837] " krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-03 17:32 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
2011-03-03 17:39 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: xinliangli at gmail dot com @ 2011-03-03 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #2 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-03-03 17:32:06 UTC ---
Please attach two dump files:
-fdump-tree-cddce2-blocks
-fdump-tree-uninit-details
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-03 12:43 ` [Bug c/47837] " krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-03 17:32 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-03 17:39 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-03 17:39 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-03 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-03 17:39:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 23536
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23536
uninit-pred-7_a.c.128t.uninit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-03 17:39 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-03 17:39 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-03 18:06 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-03 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-03 17:38:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23535
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23535
uninit-pred-7_a.c.126t.cddce2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-03 17:39 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-03 18:06 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
2011-03-03 18:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: xinliangli at gmail dot com @ 2011-03-03 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #5 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-03-03 18:06:33 UTC ---
While this exposes a limitation in uninit analysis, the cause of the warning is
that C FE behaves differently. On x86, the expression "n || l" is converted to
bitwise | expression, but on s390, it is not. Any reason why it is the case?
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-03 18:06 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-03 18:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-07 8:40 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-03 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-03 18:36:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> While this exposes a limitation in uninit analysis, the cause of the warning is
> that C FE behaves differently. On x86, the expression "n || l" is converted to
> bitwise | expression, but on s390, it is not. Any reason why it is the case?
>
> David
Because of BRANCH_COST is different.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-03 18:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-07 8:40 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
2011-03-07 8:42 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: xinliangli at gmail dot com @ 2011-03-07 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #7 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-03-07 08:40:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 23566
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23566
Patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-07 8:40 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-07 8:42 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
2011-03-07 11:48 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: xinliangli at gmail dot com @ 2011-03-07 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #8 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-03-07 08:41:25 UTC ---
Please verify the patch on hpux and os390.
Thanks,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-07 8:42 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-07 11:48 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-07 16:00 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-07 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-07 11:47:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Please verify the patch on hpux and os390.
Your patch works! It fixes uninit-pred-7_a.c on s390 and s390x.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-07 11:48 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-07 16:00 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-07 16:01 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-07 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-07 15:59:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Please verify the patch on hpux and os390.
Perhaps you could enhance your patch to cover then uninit-pred-8_a.c case as
well. It looks quite similiar:
/build3/gcc-head-build/gcc/xgcc -B/build3/gcc-head-build/gcc/
/build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c -Wuninitialized -O2
-S -o uninit-pred-8_a.s
/build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c: In function ‘foo’:
/build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c:26:11: warning: ‘v’ may
be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
/build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c: In function ‘foo_2’:
/build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c:42:11: warning: ‘v’ may
be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
As well as with uninit-pred-7_a.c the first warning is unexpected.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-07 16:00 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-07 16:01 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-07 16:01 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-07 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-07 16:01:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 23572
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23572
uninit-pred-8_a.c.126t.cddce2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-07 16:01 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-07 16:01 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-07 16:58 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-07 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-07 16:01:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23573
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23573
uninit-pred-8_a.c.128t.uninit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-07 16:01 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-07 16:58 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
2011-03-07 18:59 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: xinliangli at gmail dot com @ 2011-03-07 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #13 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-03-07 16:58:03 UTC ---
Yes -- I also wanted to do the generalization.
David
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Please verify the patch on hpux and os390.
>
> Perhaps you could enhance your patch to cover then uninit-pred-8_a.c case as
> well. It looks quite similiar:
>
> /build3/gcc-head-build/gcc/xgcc -B/build3/gcc-head-build/gcc/
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c -Wuninitialized -O2
> -S -o uninit-pred-8_a.s
>
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c: In function ‘foo’:
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c:26:11: warning: ‘v’ may
> be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c: In function ‘foo_2’:
> /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c:42:11: warning: ‘v’ may
> be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
>
> As well as with uninit-pred-7_a.c the first warning is unexpected.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-07 16:58 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-07 18:59 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2011-03-08 0:25 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu.se @ 2011-03-07 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2011-03-07 18:59:12 UTC ---
uninit-pred-7_a.c and uninit-pred-8_a.c fail in the same way on m68k-linux.
The proposed patch fixes the unexpected warning in uninit-pred-7_a.c on m68k
but not the one in uninit-pred-8_a.c.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-07 18:59 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
@ 2011-03-08 0:25 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
2011-03-08 0:27 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: xinliangli at gmail dot com @ 2011-03-08 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #15 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-03-08 00:25:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 23581
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23581
patch2
Please validate the more generalized patch.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-08 0:25 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-08 0:27 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
2011-03-08 11:08 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: xinliangli at gmail dot com @ 2011-03-08 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #16 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-03-08 00:26:47 UTC ---
The second patch should work for the two cases (verified with -mbranch-cost=0
on x86).
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-08 0:27 ` xinliangli at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-08 11:08 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2011-03-08 14:40 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-22 9:43 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu.se @ 2011-03-08 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #17 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2011-03-08 11:07:44 UTC ---
The second patch fixes both test cases on m68k-linux.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-08 11:08 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
@ 2011-03-08 14:40 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-22 9:43 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-08 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #18 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-08 14:40:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Created attachment 23581 [details]
> patch2
> Please validate the more generalized patch.
Bootstraps and works on s390x for both testcases. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)
2011-02-21 15:06 [Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-08 14:40 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-22 9:43 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-22 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #19 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks fixed then.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread