From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-363937-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27334 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2011 23:29:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 27323 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2011 23:29:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:29:29 +0000
From: "tg at mirbsd dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/47908] attribute((optimize(2))) causes ICE in m68k_sched_issue_rate
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tg at mirbsd dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-47908-4-uDKdajTFrf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:29:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg02421.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D47908

--- Comment #6 from Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot org> 2011-07-27 23:29=
:13 UTC ---
Mikael, can you please publish your =E2=80=9Cfully tested patches to fix th=
is for
4.4.5, 4.5.2, and 4.6.0=E2=80=9D so we can at least include this in the pac=
kages?

If the FSF itself (i.e. gnulib) starts using those pragmas which cause
this ICE, I think we=E2=80=99re going to see more and more popping up; I co=
uld
convince the maintainer of libvirt to include the m68k workaround in
his package (compile with -DWRAPV -fwrapv) but that doesn=E2=80=99t really =
scale.

Without the copyright assignment (WTF is going on there, mine took about
three weeks!) it=E2=80=99s still distributable under GPL, just with you as =
author.

Thanks!