From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-348740-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16302 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2011 11:50:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 16293 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2011 11:50:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:50:45 +0000
From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/47938] libgfortran symbol version node bumped unnecessarily
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-47938-4-YwwqvCRFHw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47938-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47938-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:50:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47938

Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-01 11:50:33 UTC ---
Yes, I'm leaning that way as well. FWIW, from looking at commit logs and old
mails, it seems 1.4 was added due to some confusion with symbol versioning and
ABI compatibility. 

In any case, closing as wontfix. If anyone comes up with a convincing argument
why this should be fixed, please reopen (and, be quick about it as 4.6 is going
to be released quite soon I think, and after that we certainly can't remove a
symbol node in a released branch).