From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-348741-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23168 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2011 12:19:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 23156 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2011 12:19:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:19:45 +0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/47940] warn about calls to a pure virtual from a constructor/destructor
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords Summary
Message-ID: <bug-47940-4-YmdDKhxVAg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47940-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47940-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:19:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47940

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic
            Summary|can call a pure virtual     |warn about calls to a pure
                   |from a                      |virtual from a
                   |constructor/destructor      |constructor/destructor

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-01 12:19:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> If it was a direct call, there would be a linker error.

Not if the pure virtual has a definition, and not with all compilers.
G++ does warn about that case though.

None of the compilers I tested issued a diagnostic about indirectly making a
virtual call to a pure virtual function.