From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27672 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2011 13:03:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 27663 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2011 13:03:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:03:36 +0000 From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/47941] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-2.c X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:03:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47941 Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-2.c Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com CC: rguenth@gcc.gnu.org On Linux/ia32, revision 170589 gave FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-2.c -O2 -flto line 16 sizeof (a) == 5 * sizeof (int) FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-2.c -O2 -flto line 25 sizeof (a) == 6 * sizeof (int) FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-2.c -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none line 16 sizeof (a) == 5 * sizeof (int) FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-2.c -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none line 25 sizeof (a) == 6 * sizeof (int) Revision 170587 is OK. It is caused by either revision 170588 or http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-03/msg00009.html revision 170589: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-03/msg00008.html