From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8508 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2011 12:31:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 8499 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2011 12:31:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:31:22 +0000 From: "patrick.marlier at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/47952] New: [trans-mem] undefined reference to transaction clone X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: patrick.marlier at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:31:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952 Summary: [trans-mem] undefined reference to transaction clone Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: patrick.marlier@gmail.com CC: rth@gcc.gnu.org, aldyh@gcc.gnu.org, javier.arias@bsc.es Created attachment 23513 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23513 attached almost reduced testcase. An undefined reference to a transaction clone appears at link time. $ g++ -save-temps -O0 -c -Wall -fgnu-tm testcase.i testcase.o:(.tm_clone_table+0x8): undefined reference to `transaction clone for std::_List_iterator::_List_iterator(std::_List_node_base*)' The testcase is not completely reduced... I will post it a better one soon. Considered it as high priority since it happens in the Velox stack. Thanks :) Patrick.