From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-349319-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31400 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 16:26:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 31375 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 16:26:50 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:26:42 +0000
From: "dodji at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/47957] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Type mismatch when a class derived a same name with template parameter
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.3.6
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo
Message-ID: <bug-47957-4-GVcqQV5Z5a@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47957-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47957-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00632.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47957

Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-07 16:26:23 UTC ---
Here is a testcase that does away with #include <iostream> and
#include <typeid> requirements:

struct S
{
  int m;

  S()
    : m(0)
  {
  }
};

struct Base
{
  typedef S T;
};

template<class T>
struct Derived : public Base
{
  int
  foo()
  {
    T a; // This is Base::T, not the template parameter.
    return a.m;
  }
};

int
main()
{
  Derived<char> d;
  return d.foo();
}