public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions
@ 2011-03-03 15:38 ams at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-04 11:03 ` [Bug fortran/47976] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ams at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-03 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Summary: Recent fortran testsuite regressions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ams@gcc.gnu.org
Some where between svn167945 and svn170352, the gcc 4.5 branch has acquired two
test regressions:
FAIL: default/gfortran.sum:gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test
FAIL: default/gfortran.sum:gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops execution test
These both used to pass. Both now fail with segmentation faults.
My configuration: --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi --with-arch=armv7-a
--with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47976] Recent fortran testsuite regressions
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-04 11:03 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-08 8:35 ` [Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-04 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-04 11:03:06 UTC ---
Can you narrow it down a bit? Does it also occur without optimization?
In case of Fortran, there are two commits which look as if they might be
related: r168851 for PR fortran/47775 and r168851 for PR fortran/45777.
* * *
As the issue seems to occur only for two of the runs while the test suite I
think has several more, it might well be an middle-end/target change. (I have
not browsed through those changes.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-04 11:03 ` [Bug fortran/47976] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-08 8:35 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-15 2:19 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-08 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
Summary|Recent fortran testsuite |[4.5 Regression] Recent
|regressions |gfortran.dg/actual_array_co
| |nstructor_3.f90 regression
| |on arm-linux-gnueabi
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-08 08:34:50 UTC ---
CC some ARM maintainer.
It would be tremendously useful narrow down the versions a bit more; there have
been 90 commits to 4.5 between -r167945:170352 on 4.5 (ignoring gccadmin
DATESTAMP bumps).
Additionally, it would be interesting to know whether the 4.6 trunk is affected
as well. I tried to figure this out from gcc-testresults, but there seem to be
only very few arm-linux-gnueabi results and, additionally, most of the arm-*-*
results do not include Fortran.
As the issue seems to occur only for
-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops (-finline-functions)
it might well be a middle-end/target issue. (Though it could still be a
front-end issue.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-04 11:03 ` [Bug fortran/47976] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-08 8:35 ` [Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-15 2:19 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
2011-03-16 21:27 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: michael.hope at linaro dot org @ 2011-03-15 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Michael Hope <michael.hope at linaro dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |michael.hope at linaro dot
| |org
--- Comment #3 from Michael Hope <michael.hope at linaro dot org> 2011-03-15 02:07:16 UTC ---
The failure also exists in 4.6.0 20110308 [trunk revision 170780]. See:
https://lists.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-builds/msg00290.html
for test results. Sorry that these aren't posted to gcc-testresults@gcc yet
but I'm ironing out kinks.
Running target unix
FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times forwprop2 "memset" 0
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr38968.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr38968.f90 scan-tree-dump vect "vectorized 1
loops"
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_6.f90 compilation, -O2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-15 2:19 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
@ 2011-03-16 21:27 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
2011-03-20 22:00 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: michael.hope at linaro dot org @ 2011-03-16 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #4 from Michael Hope <michael.hope at linaro dot org> 2011-03-16 21:18:59 UTC ---
Not present in svn168270, svn169407, svn169832
Present in svn170086. This leaves the following commits:
r170086 | gerald | 2011-02-13 08:22:17 +1300 (Sun, 13 Feb 2011)
r170053 | bernds | 2011-02-12 05:01:19 +1300 (Sat, 12 Feb 2011)
r170040 | danglin | 2011-02-11 15:06:55 +1300 (Fri, 11 Feb 2011)
r170013 | ro | 2011-02-11 06:23:21 +1300 (Fri, 11 Feb 2011)
r169972 | ro | 2011-02-10 03:40:15 +1300 (Thu, 10 Feb 2011)
r169951 | ebotcazou | 2011-02-09 11:56:06 +1300 (Wed, 09 Feb 2011)
r169944 | redi | 2011-02-09 09:39:29 +1300 (Wed, 09 Feb 2011)
r169883 | ro | 2011-02-08 02:15:14 +1300 (Tue, 08 Feb 2011)
r169868 | gerald | 2011-02-07 10:08:58 +1300 (Mon, 07 Feb 2011)
r170086 is ada only
r170040 is pa only
r170013 should be mips only
r169972 is libffi testsuite only
r169951 is for multilibs
r169944 is documentation
r169883 is x86/avx only
r169868 is documentation
making r170053 the most likely. I'll build 170040 and 170053 to confirm.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-16 21:27 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
@ 2011-03-20 22:00 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
2011-04-04 20:42 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: michael.hope at linaro dot org @ 2011-03-20 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #5 from Michael Hope <michael.hope at linaro dot org> 2011-03-20 21:10:37 UTC ---
Problem is introduced by r170053. See:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-4.5~svn170053/logs/armv7l-maverick-cbuild88-carina7-cortexa8r1/gcc-testsuite.txt
The commit before it does not have the problem:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-4.5~svn170040/logs/armv7l-maverick-cbuild88-ursa2-cortexa8r1/gcc-testsuite.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-20 22:00 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
@ 2011-04-04 20:42 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-04 21:32 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-04 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-04 20:42:11 UTC ---
Adding bernds to the CC .
Ramana
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-04 20:42 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-04 21:32 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-10 10:36 ` [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-04 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.04.04 21:32:23
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-04 21:32 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-10 10:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-11 9:04 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-10 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|fortran |middle-end
Known to work| |4.5.2
Summary|[4.5 Regression] Recent |[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]
|gfortran.dg/actual_array_co |Recent
|nstructor_3.f90 regression |gfortran.dg/actual_array_co
|on arm-linux-gnueabi |nstructor_3.f90 regression
| |on arm-linux-gnueabi
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-10 10:36:37 UTC ---
A wrong-code regression on the branch for a primary taget. P1.
Bernd, can you at least investigate? Thanks.
Can someone check the status on the 4.6 and 4.7 branch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-10 10:36 ` [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-11 9:04 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-15 12:11 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-11 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-11 09:03:55 UTC ---
Patch posted here and waiting for feedback.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00540.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-11 9:04 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-15 12:11 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-19 1:05 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-15 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-15 12:10:54 UTC ---
Ramana,
it looks like I'm running out of time to test this properly before I disappear
for a few weeks. Can you give this a proper ARM test run and commit if it's
urgent?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-15 12:11 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-19 1:05 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
2011-04-19 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: michael.hope at linaro dot org @ 2011-04-19 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #10 from Michael Hope <michael.hope at linaro dot org> 2011-04-19 01:05:42 UTC ---
The proposed patch bootstraps fine on i686, x86_64, and armv7l. See:
https://code.launchpad.net/~michaelh1/gcc-linaro/pr47976/+merge/58062
-FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test
+PASS: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test
-FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops execution test
+PASS: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops execution test
-FAIL: 27_io/basic_streambuf/sputc/wchar_t/1057.cc execution test
+PASS: 27_io/basic_streambuf/sputc/wchar_t/1057.cc execution test
The 1057.cc change is probably due to a change in binutils.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-19 1:05 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
@ 2011-04-19 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-19 11:05 ` [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-19 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-19 10:54:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 19 10:54:47 2011
New Revision: 172706
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172706
Log:
2011-04-19 Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
PR fortran/47976
* reload1.c (inc_for_reload): Return void. All callers changed.
(emit_input_reload_insns): Don't try to delete previous output
reloads to a register, or record spill_reg_store for autoincs.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/reload1.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-19 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-19 11:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-19 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] |[4.5/4.6 Regression] Recent
|Recent |gfortran.dg/actual_array_co
|gfortran.dg/actual_array_co |nstructor_3.f90 regression
|nstructor_3.f90 regression |on arm-linux-gnueabi
|on arm-linux-gnueabi |
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-19 11:05:27 UTC ---
Should be fixed on the trunk. Bootstrap/tests on the 4.5 branch running for
{x86_64,i586,ppc,ppc64,ia64,s390,s390x}-linux.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-19 11:05 ` [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-20 9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 11:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 11:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-20 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-20 09:48:07 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 20 09:48:00 2011
New Revision: 172765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172765
Log:
2011-04-20 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from mainline
2011-04-19 Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
PR fortran/47976
* reload1.c (inc_for_reload): Return void. All callers changed.
(emit_input_reload_insns): Don't try to delete previous output
reloads to a register, or record spill_reg_store for autoincs.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/reload1.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-20 9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-20 11:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 11:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-20 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-20 11:05:13 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 20 11:05:09 2011
New Revision: 172766
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172766
Log:
2011-04-20 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from 4.6 branch
2011-04-19 Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
PR fortran/47976
* reload1.c (inc_for_reload): Return void. All callers changed.
(emit_input_reload_insns): Don't try to delete previous output
reloads to a register, or record spill_reg_store for autoincs.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/reload1.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-20 11:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-20 11:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-20 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-20 11:05:42 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-20 11:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-03 15:38 [Bug target/47976] New: Recent fortran testsuite regressions ams at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-04 11:03 ` [Bug fortran/47976] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-08 8:35 ` [Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-15 2:19 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
2011-03-16 21:27 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
2011-03-20 22:00 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
2011-04-04 20:42 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-04 21:32 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-10 10:36 ` [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-11 9:04 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-15 12:11 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-19 1:05 ` michael.hope at linaro dot org
2011-04-19 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-19 11:05 ` [Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 11:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 11:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).