From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12468 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2013 21:26:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 12195 invoked by uid 55); 4 Jan 2013 21:26:05 -0000 From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/48065] LTO: assertion failed in optimize_inline_calls, at tree-inline.c:4246 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:26:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, lto X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at ucw dot cz X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00349.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-04 21:26:04 UTC --- > I think we don't fail late now, at least not in expand_call_inline (unless > inline_failed is re-computed at LTRANS stage). Yes, i think we simply produce invalid gimple and type later on errneous conversion. At least we did so last time I hit the issue with Mozilla ;) Honza