public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
@ 2011-03-10 23:04 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:09 ` [Bug fortran/48066] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 more replies)
0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Summary: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of
zero-sized array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org
Reported on IRC. The following program segfaults with gfortran 4.3 to 4.6 but
works with gfortran 4.1:
program p
real(8) :: empty(0, 3), square(0)
square = sum(empty * empty, 2)
print *, "square=", square
end
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 23:09 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 23:09:15 UTC ---
Valgrind:
==9860== Invalid write of size 8
==9860== at 0x4EAB980: _gfortran_sum_r8 (sum_r8.c:147)
==9860== by 0x400955: MAIN__ (test.f90:3)
>From libgfortran/generated/sum_r8.f90:
dest = retarray->data;
[...]
if (len <= 0)
*dest = 0;
which fails if dest == NULL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:09 ` [Bug fortran/48066] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 23:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-03-10 23:19 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-03-10 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.03.10 23:14:27
CC| |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-03-10 23:14:27 UTC ---
The "Bus error" seems fixed by the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829#c32.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:09 ` [Bug fortran/48066] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-03-10 23:19 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:35 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 23:19:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The "Bus error" seems fixed by the patch in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829#c32.
Well, it does not fix it, it just hides the problem: The patch in PR 43829
moves SUM into the front end - thus, it makes the libgfortran code unreachable
for this test case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 23:19 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 23:35 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 23:34:53 UTC ---
For completeness, the submitted asked at c.l.f whether the program is valid;
Richard Maine thinks so. (I concur ;-)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/457a5b283c702bbc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 23:35 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 23:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 11:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work| |4.1.2
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.6
Known to fail| |4.3.4, 4.4.0, 4.5.1, 4.6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 23:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-11 11:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 9:38 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-11 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-11 11:28:57 UTC ---
Draft patch:
--- a/libgfortran/m4/ifunction.m4
+++ b/libgfortran/m4/ifunction.m4
@@ -132,7 +132,10 @@ name`'rtype_qual`_'atype_code (rtype * const restrict
retarray,
')dnl
define(START_ARRAY_BLOCK,
` if (len <= 0)
- *dest = '$1`;
+ {
+ if (dest)
+ *dest = '$1`;
+ }
else
{
for (n = 0; n < len; n++, src += delta)
@@ -313,7 +316,10 @@ void
')dnl
define(START_MASKED_ARRAY_BLOCK,
` if (len <= 0)
- *dest = '$1`;
+ {
+ if (dest)
+ *dest = '$1`;
+ }
else
{
for (n = 0; n < len; n++, src += delta, msrc += mdelta)
--- a/libgfortran/m4/ifunction_logical.m4
+++ b/libgfortran/m4/ifunction_logical.m4
@@ -159,7 +159,10 @@ name`'rtype_qual`_'atype_code (rtype * const restrict
retarray,
')dnl
define(START_ARRAY_BLOCK,
` if (len <= 0)
- *dest = '$1`;
+ {
+ if (dest)
+ *dest = '$1`;
+ }
else
{
for (n = 0; n < len; n++, src += delta)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-11 11:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-12 9:38 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 10:11 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-12 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 09:38:18 UTC ---
Of course, the patch does not work as "dest" is not NULL ...
I wonder whether a patch like the following would be correct. One probably
needs to go through all the users of ifunction{,_logical}.m4 and check what is
the correct solution, which might or might not be the one below:
@@ -143,9 +143,7 @@ sum_r4 (gfc_array_r4 * const restrict retarray,
{
result = 0;
- if (len <= 0)
- *dest = 0;
- else
+ if (len > 0)
{
for (n = 0; n < len; n++, src += delta)
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-12 9:38 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-12 10:11 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 10:16 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-12 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 10:10:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Of course, the patch does not work as "dest" is not NULL ...
>
> I wonder whether a patch like the following would be correct.
Probably, although it might be easier just to do
Index: m4/ifunction_logical.m4
===================================================================
--- m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Revision 170320)
+++ m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@
src_kind = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE (array);
len = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_EXTENT(array,dim);
- if (len < 0)
- len = 0;
+ if (len <= 0)
+ return;
delta = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_STRIDE_BYTES(array,dim);
Index: m4/ifunction.m4
===================================================================
--- m4/ifunction.m4 (Revision 170320)
+++ m4/ifunction.m4 (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
rank = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_RANK (array) - 1;
len = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_EXTENT(array,dim);
- if (len < 0)
- len = 0;
+ if (len <= 0)
+ return;
+
delta = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_STRIDE(array,dim);
for (n = 0; n < dim; n++)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-12 10:11 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-12 10:16 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 17:22 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-12 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 10:15:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> --- m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Revision 170320)
> +++ m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@
> src_kind = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE (array);
>
> len = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_EXTENT(array,dim);
> - if (len < 0)
> - len = 0;
> + if (len <= 0)
> + return;
... probably would not work for printing empty arrays.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-12 10:16 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-12 17:22 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 21:46 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-12 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 17:22:50 UTC ---
This one looks better:
Index: m4/ifunction_logical.m4
===================================================================
--- m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Revision 170897)
+++ m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
dest = retarray->data;
- continue_loop = 1;
+ continue_loop = len > 0;
while (continue_loop)
{
const GFC_LOGICAL_1 * restrict src;
@@ -158,17 +158,12 @@
{
')dnl
define(START_ARRAY_BLOCK,
-` if (len <= 0)
- *dest = '$1`;
- else
+` for (n = 0; n < len; n++, src += delta)
{
- for (n = 0; n < len; n++, src += delta)
- {
')dnl
define(FINISH_ARRAY_FUNCTION,
- ` }
- *dest = result;
- }
+` }
+ *dest = result;
}
/* Advance to the next element. */
count[0]++;
Index: m4/ifunction.m4
===================================================================
--- m4/ifunction.m4 (Revision 170897)
+++ m4/ifunction.m4 (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
base = array->data;
dest = retarray->data;
- continue_loop = 1;
+ continue_loop = len > 0;
while (continue_loop)
{
const atype_name * restrict src;
@@ -131,18 +131,13 @@
{
')dnl
define(START_ARRAY_BLOCK,
-` if (len <= 0)
- *dest = '$1`;
- else
+` for (n = 0; n < len; n++, src += delta)
{
- for (n = 0; n < len; n++, src += delta)
- {
')dnl
define(FINISH_ARRAY_FUNCTION,
-` }
- '$1`
- *dest = result;
- }
+` }
+ '$1`
+ *dest = result;
}
/* Advance to the next element. */
count[0]++;
Let's see if it survives regression-testing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-12 17:22 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-12 21:46 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 22:50 ` [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-12 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 21:42:39 UTC ---
Mine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-12 21:46 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-12 22:50 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 23:18 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-12 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 |[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|Regression] Segfault with |Segfault with SUM of
|SUM of zero-sized array |zero-sized array
Known to fail|4.6.0 |
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 22:50:29 UTC ---
Fixed on 4.6, backport to 4.5 yet to come.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-12 22:50 ` [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-12 23:18 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-13 20:58 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-13 20:59 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-12 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 23:18:11 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 12 23:18:09 2011
New Revision: 170913
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170913
Log:
2011-03-12 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libfortran/48066
* gfortran.dg/intrinsic_ifunction_2.f90: Correct PR number.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_ifunction_2.f90
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-12 23:18 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-13 20:58 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-13 20:59 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-13 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-13 20:57:53 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 13 20:57:49 2011
New Revision: 170924
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170924
Log:
2011-03-13 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libfortran/48066
Backport from trunk
* m4/ifunction.m4: If return array is empty, return.
* m4/ifunction_logical.m4: Likewise.
* generated/all_l16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/all_l1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/all_l2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/all_l4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/all_l8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/any_l16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/any_l1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/any_l2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/any_l4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/any_l8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/count_16_l.c: Regenerated.
* generated/count_1_l.c: Regenerated.
* generated/count_2_l.c: Regenerated.
* generated/count_4_l.c: Regenerated.
* generated/count_8_l.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_16_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_16_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_16_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_16_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_16_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_16_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_16_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_16_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_16_r8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_4_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_4_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_4_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_4_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_4_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_4_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_4_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_4_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_4_r8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_8_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_8_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_8_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_8_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_8_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_8_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_8_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_8_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxloc1_8_r8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxval_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxval_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxval_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxval_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxval_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxval_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxval_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxval_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/maxval_r8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_16_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_16_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_16_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_16_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_16_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_16_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_16_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_16_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_16_r8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_4_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_4_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_4_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_4_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_4_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_4_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_4_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_4_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_4_r8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_8_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_8_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_8_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_8_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_8_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_8_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_8_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_8_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minloc1_8_r8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minval_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minval_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minval_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minval_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minval_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minval_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minval_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minval_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/minval_r8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_c10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_c16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_c4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_c8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/product_r8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_c10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_c16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_c4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_c8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_i16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_i1.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_i2.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_i4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_i8.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_r10.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_r16.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_r4.c: Regenerated.
* generated/sum_r8.c: Regenerated.
2011-03-13 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libfortran/48066
Backport from trunk
* gfortran.dg/intrinsic_ifunction_2.f90: Correct PR number.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_ifunction_2.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/all_l1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/all_l16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/all_l2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/all_l4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/all_l8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/any_l1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/any_l16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/any_l2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/any_l4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/any_l8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/count_16_l.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/count_1_l.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/count_2_l.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/count_4_l.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/count_8_l.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_16_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_16_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_16_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_16_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_16_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_16_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_16_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_16_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_16_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_4_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_4_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_4_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_4_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_4_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_4_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_4_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_4_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_4_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_8_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_8_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_8_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_8_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_8_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_8_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_8_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_8_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxloc1_8_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxval_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxval_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxval_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxval_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxval_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxval_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxval_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxval_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/maxval_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_16_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_16_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_16_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_16_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_16_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_16_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_16_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_16_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_16_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_4_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_4_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_4_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_4_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_4_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_4_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_4_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_4_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_4_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_8_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_8_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_8_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_8_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_8_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_8_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_8_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_8_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minloc1_8_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minval_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minval_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minval_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minval_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minval_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minval_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minval_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minval_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/minval_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_c10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_c16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_c4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_c8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/product_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_c10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_c16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_c4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_c8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_i1.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_i16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_i2.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_i4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_i8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_r10.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_r16.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_r4.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/generated/sum_r8.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/m4/ifunction.m4
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libgfortran/m4/ifunction_logical.m4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-13 20:58 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-13 20:59 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-13 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-13 20:58:46 UTC ---
Backported to 4.5.
Closing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-13 20:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-10 23:04 [Bug fortran/48066] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:09 ` [Bug fortran/48066] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-03-10 23:19 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:35 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 23:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 11:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 9:38 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 10:11 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 10:16 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 17:22 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 21:46 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 22:50 ` [Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 23:18 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-13 20:58 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-13 20:59 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).