public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/48069] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C
@ 2011-03-11  6:27 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2011-03-11  6:29 ` [Bug c++/48069] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-03-11  6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069

           Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com


On Linux/x86, revision 170853 gave:

FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C (test for excess errors)

Revision 170848 is OK.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/48069] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C
  2011-03-11  6:27 [Bug c++/48069] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-11  6:29 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2011-03-11  7:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-03-11  6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at redhat dot com
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0

--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-03-11 06:28:49 UTC ---
It is caused by revision 170853:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-03/msg00274.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/48069] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C
  2011-03-11  6:27 [Bug c++/48069] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2011-03-11  6:29 ` [Bug c++/48069] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-11  7:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2011-03-11 10:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-03-11  7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.03.11 07:17:13
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-03-11 07:17:13 UTC ---
Confirmed. The ICE is

/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C:11:36: internal
compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types const X [] and const
X []


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/48069] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C
  2011-03-11  6:27 [Bug c++/48069] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2011-03-11  6:29 ` [Bug c++/48069] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2011-03-11  7:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-03-11 10:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-03-11 14:37 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-11 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
           Priority|P3                          |P1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/48069] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C
  2011-03-11  6:27 [Bug c++/48069] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-03-11 10:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-11 14:37 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-03-11 14:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-03-11 14:46 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-11 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-11 14:37:36 UTC ---
Weird, I wonder how my testing missed that.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/48069] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C
  2011-03-11  6:27 [Bug c++/48069] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-03-11 14:37 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-11 14:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-03-11 14:46 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-11 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069

--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-11 14:44:53 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 11 14:44:49 2011
New Revision: 170872

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170872
Log:
    PR c++/48069
    * tree.c (type_hash_eq): Use COMPLETE_TYPE_P, not
    COMPLETE_OR_UNBOUND_ARRAY_TYPE_P.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/tree.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/48069] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C
  2011-03-11  6:27 [Bug c++/48069] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-03-11 14:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-11 14:46 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-11 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-11 14:46:12 UTC ---
Fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-11 14:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-11  6:27 [Bug c++/48069] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-03-11  6:29 ` [Bug c++/48069] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-03-11  7:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-03-11 10:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 14:37 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 14:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 14:46 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).