From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3059 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2011 10:42:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 3048 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2011 10:42:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 10:42:01 +0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/48090] [4.5 Regression] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.5.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Priority Status Last reconfirmed Version Ever Confirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 10:42:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00998.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 Richard Guenther changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2011.04.10 10:41:58 Version|unknown |4.5.2 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-10 10:41:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I confirm that backporting r159644 and r159683 make things work. From comment > 8, I guess that the bug is still there and that one can still hit it sooner or > later, right ? (btw, amazing job) It probably papers over it as you guessed. This bug lacks proper analysis.