From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-349955-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19651 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2011 17:49:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 19641 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Mar 2011 17:49:14 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:49:10 +0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-48094-4-X3Bm7Kjt5C@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48094-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48094-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:49:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg01268.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.03.12 17:48:56
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 17:48:56 UTC ---

(a) the first is because LTO has produced two image_info instances with
different mangled names ...

     e.g. L_OBJC_ImageInfo.2044 / L_OBJC_ImageInfo.2048

     this is visible on darwin 9 (although it does not produce an error).

(b) the second needs more checking - the tests pass on darwin9 (and darwin10
with 3.2.5 - last time I tried)