From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-373857-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20556 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2011 14:01:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 20547 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2011 14:01:56 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:01:43 +0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-48108-4-2mscdoxYTv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48108-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48108-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg01353.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-13 14:00:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Can we backport r180523 to gcc-4_6-branch (perhaps even for gcc 4.6.2)?

done now - Mike had approved on the mailing list.

> Also in gcc trunk we should also now fully revert...
> 
> Author: mrs
> Date: Mon Mar 14 02:47:49 2011
> New Revision: 170929

I don't think we can do this until PR49992 and likely PR48109 are fixed.

Fixed.