From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-350889-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 484 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2011 12:46:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 472 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2011 12:46:30 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:46:22 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/48189] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGFPE (division by zero) in in predict_loops () at predict.c:991 with --param max-predicted-iterations=0
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.3.6
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed CC Target Milestone Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-48189-4-zzuJYHXCCk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48189-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48189-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:54:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg02202.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.03.21 12:46:09
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.6
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-21 12:46:09 UTC ---
Honza, if the loop is predicted to run zero times the exit edge isn't executed.
What's the probability value for this?  I'd say it's NaN (aka, not relevant
as it isn't executed as all).

It doesn't seem to be correct to limit max-predicted-iterations to >= 1
as estimated_loop_iterations_int could return zero as well.