public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/48220] DW_OP_GNU_entry_value/DW_TAG_GNU_call_site_parameter vs. register window targets
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:50:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-48220-4-F531yzs6pO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-48220-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48220

--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-23 17:33:54 UTC ---
> The aim of the extension is to allow correct debug info, not almost correct,
> so I think defining "upon entering of the current subprogram" as anything but
> before the first insn in it is wrong and would make it not possible to use
> DW_OP_GNU_entry_value before the point (end of prologue or what?).

Yes, end of the prologue.  I was under the impression that, with your alternate
scheme, the opposite situation would arise, i.e. it wouldn't be possible to use
DW_OP_GNU_entry_value after the end of the prologue.  Given how GDB works, this
sounded far less appealing than the current scheme.  Sorry if I misunderstood.

> As for teaching var-tracking about save/restore on SPARC, it would be a matter
> of adding probably two target hooks, one that would be run e.g. at the end of
> adjust_insn and would be supposed to change it using validate_change (...,
> true); in whatever way var-tracking should understand the insn.
> So e.g. for save you'd add into the parallel things like:
>   (set (reg:P 24) (reg:P 8))
>   (clobber (reg:P 8))
> and similarly for all the other param regs.  Perhaps even make it explicit
> what exactly is subtracted from %sp.
> And the second target hook would return a different rtx for DECL_INCOMING_RTL,
> with registers adjusted back.  Because for -O0 if we don't do var-tracking we
> probably want DECL_INCOMING_RTL to still refer to %i0 etc., even when it is
> not correct before the save.

I see, thanks for the explanation.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-23 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-21 16:35 [Bug debug/48220] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-21 16:56 ` [Bug debug/48220] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-22 22:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-23 17:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-23 17:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2011-03-23 21:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-02 19:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-11 16:02 ` [Bug debug/48220] DW_OP_GNU_entry_value/DW_TAG_GNU_call_site_parameter vs register window ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-11 16:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-14 21:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-15 17:10 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04 11:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-48220-4-F531yzs6pO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).