From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1425 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2011 19:21:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 1415 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Apr 2011 19:21:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:20:59 +0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/48227] "rep ret" generated for -march=core2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Target Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:21:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48227 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target| |x86_64-linux-gnu --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-01 19:20:52 UTC --- A good question is does it make a difference in actual performance numbers, it might still make a positive difference. Until someone tries it out and sees the difference in performance, I am going to say we should keep it.