From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-469611-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11928 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2014 11:24:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11902 invoked by uid 48); 6 Dec 2014 11:24:22 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 11:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.5.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-48244-4-8UnnXcBHXa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00618.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244

--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> I didn't send testresults to the list because without a dozen patches gcc
> won't compile at all. 

Did someone opened PRs for these failures? Patches should be submitted to
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org (and to fortran@gcc.gnu.org for Fortran or
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org for libstdc++-v3).

> Testresults and necessary patches can be found at 
> http://pkgsrc-wip.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pkgsrc-wip/wip/gcc50snapshot
> and gfortran works quite well on NetBSD.

> Would it help to send test_summary.log to the testresult mailing list ?

I am reluctant to post test results with a lot of patches. I think it is better
to post the results with the minimal set of patches to bootstrap, then results
with one or two specific patches you can refer to on the gcc lists.