public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug debug/48253] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues
@ 2011-03-23 13:08 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-23 13:11 ` [Bug debug/48253] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-23 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: jakub@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: jakub@gcc.gnu.org
CC: tromey@gcc.gnu.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Created attachment 23756
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23756
aranges.c
As following testcases show, while PR48176 fixed some .debug_aranges related
regressions, with the addition of .text.startup and .text.exit sections we
still sometimes don't emit .debug_aranges covering all the code snippets for a
particular CU.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48253] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues
2011-03-23 13:08 [Bug debug/48253] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-23 13:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-23 14:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-23 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-23 13:01:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 23757
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23757
aranges2.c
Another testcase, this one needs profile feedback (i.e. run compile/link
first with the options and -fprofile-generate, run, compile again with
-fprofile-use).
On this testcase we can see other bugs, e.g. DW_AT_ranges for f1
DW_TAG_subprogram is wrong, it covers twice the same range, once perhaps with a
few extra bytes of padding before it, and then not at all the cold part.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48253] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues
2011-03-23 13:08 [Bug debug/48253] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-23 13:11 ` [Bug debug/48253] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-23 14:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-24 16:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-23 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-23 13:25:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 23758
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23758
gcc46-pr48253.patch
Untested fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48253] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues
2011-03-23 13:08 [Bug debug/48253] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-23 13:11 ` [Bug debug/48253] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-23 14:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-24 16:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-29 2:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-24 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48253] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues
2011-03-23 13:08 [Bug debug/48253] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-24 16:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-29 2:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-29 20:30 ` [Bug debug/48253] [4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-29 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-28 23:55:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 28 23:55:47 2011
New Revision: 171642
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171642
Log:
PR debug/48253
* dwarf2out.c (struct dw_fde_struct): Remove dw_fde_hot_section_label,
dw_fde_hot_section_end_label, dw_fde_unlikely_section_label,
dw_fde_unlikely_section_end_label, cold_in_std_section,
dw_fde_switched_sections and dw_fde_switched_cold_to_hot fields.
Add dw_fde_second_begin, dw_fde_second_end and second_in_std_section
fields.
(output_fde): Use dw_fde_second_{begin,end} if second is
true, otherwise dw_fde_{begin,end}.
(output_call_frame_info): Test dw_fde_second_begin != NULL
instead of dw_fde_switched_sections.
(dwarf2out_begin_prologue): Stop initializing removed dw_fde_struct
fields, initialize new fields. Initialize in_std_section
unconditionally from the first partition.
(dwarf2out_end_epilogue): Don't override dw_fde_end when
dw_fde_second_begin is non-NULL.
(dwarf2out_switch_text_section): Stop initializing removed
dw_fde_struct fields, initialize new fields, initialize
also dw_fde_end here. Set dw_fde_switch_cfi even when
dwarf2out_do_cfi_asm (). Call var_location_switch_text_section.
(struct var_loc_list_def): Add last_before_switch field.
(arange_table, arange_table_allocated, arange_table_in_use,
ARANGE_TABLE_INCREMENT, add_arange): Removed.
(size_of_aranges): Count !in_std_section and !second_in_std_section
hunks in fdes, instead of looking at arange_table_in_use.
(output_aranges): Add aranges_length argument, don't call
size_of_aranges here. Instead of using aranges_table*
emit ranges for fdes when !in_std_section resp.
!second_in_std_section.
(dw_loc_list): Break ranges crossing section switch.
(convert_cfa_to_fb_loc_list): Likewise. If switched sections,
use dw_fde_second_end instead of dw_fde_end as end of last
range.
(gen_subprogram_die): Don't call add_arange. Use
dw_fde_{begin,end} for first partition and if switched
section dw_fde_second_{begin,end} for the second.
(var_location_switch_text_section_1,
var_location_switch_text_section): New functions.
(dwarf2out_begin_function): Initialize cold_text_section even
when function_section () isn't text_section.
(prune_unused_types): Don't walk arange_table.
(dwarf2out_finish): Don't needlessly test
flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition when testing cold_text_section_used.
If info_section_emitted, call size_of_aranges and if it indicates
non-empty .debug_aranges, call output_aranges with the computed
size. Stop using removed dw_fde_struct fields, use
dw_fde_{begin,end} for first partition and dw_fde_second_{begin,end}
for second.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48253] [4.6 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues
2011-03-23 13:08 [Bug debug/48253] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-29 2:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-29 20:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-29 22:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 0:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-29 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2011.03.29 20:11:32
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] |[4.6 Regression] Further
|Further .debug_aranges |.debug_aranges issues
|issues |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-29 20:11:32 UTC ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48253] [4.6 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues
2011-03-23 13:08 [Bug debug/48253] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-29 20:30 ` [Bug debug/48253] [4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-29 22:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 0:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-29 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-29 22:48:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 29 22:47:59 2011
New Revision: 171702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171702
Log:
PR debug/48253
* dwarf2out.c (struct dw_fde_struct): Remove dw_fde_hot_section_label,
dw_fde_hot_section_end_label, dw_fde_unlikely_section_label,
dw_fde_unlikely_section_end_label, cold_in_std_section,
dw_fde_switched_sections and dw_fde_switched_cold_to_hot fields.
Add dw_fde_second_begin, dw_fde_second_end and second_in_std_section
fields.
(output_fde): Use dw_fde_second_{begin,end} if second is
true, otherwise dw_fde_{begin,end}.
(output_call_frame_info): Test dw_fde_second_begin != NULL
instead of dw_fde_switched_sections.
(dwarf2out_begin_prologue): Stop initializing removed dw_fde_struct
fields, initialize new fields. Initialize in_std_section
unconditionally from the first partition.
(dwarf2out_end_epilogue): Don't override dw_fde_end when
dw_fde_second_begin is non-NULL.
(dwarf2out_switch_text_section): Stop initializing removed
dw_fde_struct fields, initialize new fields, initialize
also dw_fde_end here. Set dw_fde_switch_cfi even when
dwarf2out_do_cfi_asm (). Call var_location_switch_text_section.
(struct var_loc_list_def): Add last_before_switch field.
(arange_table, arange_table_allocated, arange_table_in_use,
ARANGE_TABLE_INCREMENT, add_arange): Removed.
(size_of_aranges): Count !in_std_section and !second_in_std_section
hunks in fdes, instead of looking at arange_table_in_use.
(output_aranges): Add aranges_length argument, don't call
size_of_aranges here. Instead of using aranges_table*
emit ranges for fdes when !in_std_section resp.
!second_in_std_section.
(dw_loc_list): Break ranges crossing section switch.
(convert_cfa_to_fb_loc_list): Likewise. If switched sections,
use dw_fde_second_end instead of dw_fde_end as end of last
range.
(gen_subprogram_die): Don't call add_arange. Use
dw_fde_{begin,end} for first partition and if switched
section dw_fde_second_{begin,end} for the second.
(var_location_switch_text_section_1,
var_location_switch_text_section): New functions.
(dwarf2out_begin_function): Initialize cold_text_section even
when function_section () isn't text_section.
(prune_unused_types): Don't walk arange_table.
(dwarf2out_finish): Don't needlessly test
flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition when testing cold_text_section_used.
If info_section_emitted, call size_of_aranges and if it indicates
non-empty .debug_aranges, call output_aranges with the computed
size. Stop using removed dw_fde_struct fields, use
dw_fde_{begin,end} for first partition and dw_fde_second_{begin,end}
for second.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/dwarf2out.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48253] [4.6 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues
2011-03-23 13:08 [Bug debug/48253] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-29 22:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-30 0:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-30 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-29 22:49:26 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-29 22:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-23 13:08 [Bug debug/48253] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-23 13:11 ` [Bug debug/48253] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-23 14:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-24 16:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-29 2:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-29 20:30 ` [Bug debug/48253] [4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-29 22:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 0:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).