From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-351652-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4224 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2011 09:22:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 4215 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2011 09:22:21 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:22:17 +0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/48290] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c, ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1072
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-48290-4-Sz9FifPhZy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48290-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48290-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:03:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg02965.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290

--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-03-29 09:22:15 UTC ---
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
> 
> --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-03-28 18:26:52 UTC ---
> The patch in comment #3 fixes the ICE, but the test still fails:
> 
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER LOOP VECTORIZED" 1
> 
> Compiling with -Ofast -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=2 I get
> 
> /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c:11: note: not vectorized:
> unsupported data-type
> /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c:6: note: vectorized 0 loops
> in function.

That's expected.  I suppose the testcase is no longer testing what it
was supposed to test (even before, as LIM was applying store-sinking to
the store).