From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26933 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2012 11:08:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 26924 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2012 11:08:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:07:54 +0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: boehm-gc X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg02564.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-27 11:06:43 UTC --- > --- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-27 10:32:28 UTC --- > It fails everywhere. But we don't seem to be sure it is a regression > (thus, the test was run before). -> P2. It certainly doesn't fail everywhere: at least it passes on all of my targets (Solaris/SPARC and x86, IRIX and Tru64 Unix). The test isn't run on the 4.6 branch (before the conversion of the boehm-gc testsuite to dejagnu), but failures would have gone unnoticed since they don't show up in mail-report.log. Rainer