From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15846 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2011 18:31:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 15836 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Mar 2011 18:31:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:31:35 +0000 From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:53:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg03380.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 Thomas Koenig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-31 18:31:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > reduced: > > INTEGER, DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: a > DO I=1,MIN(SIZE(a),SIZE(a)) > ENDDO > END Thanks, Joost. Slightly more reduced test case (from the point of stepping through the code): interface pure integer function f() end function f end interface DO I=1,min(f(),f()) ENDDO END Somehow, the insertion of the statement with the extra variable doesn't work for DO loops.