public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/48365] Non-constant references in std::valarray::operator
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-48365-4-SxlwQTXdqx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-48365-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48365

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|denin at mail dot ru        |gdr@integrable-solutions.ne
                   |                            |t

--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-03-30 15:29:21 UTC ---
Gaby, can you have a look to this issue? It seems to me that in general, given
the expression templates mechanism we have in place, something like

  k = k[0] * k,        (1)

where k is a valarray, cannot possibly work as intuitively expected, because
the multiplication is expanded "in place": operator= triggers the computation
of the new k[0] and then k[1] which definitely uses the new k[0], contrary to
intuition. Is this actually undefined behavior, like morally in

  operator*(const T& t, const valarray<T>& v)

t cannot be an element of v? Seems something falling under the special features
of valarray wrt aliasing, but I don't see it mentioned anywhere in C++03.

Interestingly, if I change (1) to

  k *= k[0]

which should be in principle equivalent, the behavior is the same on GCC,
whereas another implementation of valarray agrees with GCC in this case.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-30 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-30 14:11 [Bug libstdc++/48365] New: " denin at mail dot ru
2011-03-30 15:44 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com [this message]
2011-03-31 20:30 ` [Bug libstdc++/48365] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-11 18:34 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-06-14 14:11 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-06-14 14:18 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-48365-4-SxlwQTXdqx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).