From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28234 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2011 00:07:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 28224 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Mar 2011 00:07:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:07:34 +0000 From: "law at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/48371] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:35:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg03284.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-31 00:07:31 UTC --- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/30/11 17:27, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371 > > --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-30 23:26:54 UTC --- > Created attachment 23828 > --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23828 > Preprocessed libgcc2.i, repeat ICE for cris-elf with -fpreprocessed libgcc2.i > -march=v32 -O2 > > In the odd event that you'd want to verify a fix on more than x86, here's a > test-case for cris-elf (and as it turns out, crisv32-elf). I just checked in a fix for 48371 (reload1.c). If you could verify that change fixes the cris problems it would be greatly appreciated (that patch wasn't supposed to change code generation at all :-) jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNk8W6AAoJEBRtltQi2kC7DOkH/2kbHSHLxNO7ySsDR6EApZmH biGUe4UFi+Rh4mgqOCB/ZahKD+ak0IP0/KJaolmGh6hDn9x+S1wlsRsimwjPdyUI qaX2toZiKmiEkbadgKPV1PGWzHHeMfwuRUG1qtwiFOutFyitc8XDap5IO+V7sYpl AjpM06/WbD/tbeAzFL8GVLXKpxDrRoZvog+GZ/ruPAoSf7xDfAFpvfmpuS8gVE57 MRBbJU1AEoN/JoCFLfV0NCMB2lmL99dEzsjz/H8GMEXaPPDlzWtc0Zpl0QucSNYr tV/HASQj3zCdYj7k3rxXL/i8cNSRuiuAMtMjnLV2t/hb2k76qNnRs+21cDw+WYU= =SMF8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----