From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-358655-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14396 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2011 11:11:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 14386 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2011 11:11:58 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:11:45 +0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/48377] [4.6/4.7 regression] miscompilation at -O3
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.1
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-48377-4-k4avJXxzba@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48377-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48377-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:11:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377

--- Comment #43 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-03 11:10:35 UTC ---
> Conceptually it is no different from
> struct A { char c; unsigned int d; } __attribute__((packed));
> 
> unsigned int
> id (struct A *p)
> {
>   return p->d;
> }
> 
> which is handled.

Guess what?  We implement under-aligned scalar types in Ada, i.e. the
equivalent of typedef unsigned int U __attribute__((__aligned__ (1))) by
wrapping them up in a record type. ;-)  As soon as you give SImode to the type,
the game is over.