From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-353055-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27403 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2011 10:09:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 27391 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2011 10:09:14 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_CF
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 10:09:09 +0000
From: "stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/48389] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in make_edges, at cfgbuild.c:319 with -mtune=pentiumpro
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.5.3
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-48389-4-h8dihQsgFP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48389-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48389-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 10:09:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00959.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D48389

--- Comment #14 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com <stevenb.gcc at gmail dot=
 com> 2011-04-09 10:08:57 UTC ---
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:38 PM, matz at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> --- Comment #10 from Michael Matz <matz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-08 11=
:37:59 UTC ---
> I was asking what specifically doesn't work. =C2=A0I.e. why the changes t=
o cfgbuild
> were necessary. =C2=A0I'm not so dense to not understand that it doesn't =
work.

But you are so dense to not look at all information in the PR? :-P

I had made PR48486 blocking this one. It explains what the cfgbuild.c
changes were supposed to resolve.