public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/48478] New: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid accepted
@ 2011-04-06 11:51 ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
2011-04-06 13:20 ` [Bug fortran/48478] Array-constructor with type-spec: reject valid/accept invalid burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-25 10:35 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ian_harvey at bigpond dot com @ 2011-04-06 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48478
Summary: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid
accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ian_harvey@bigpond.com
Created attachment 23898
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23898
Demonstrates valid and invalid syntax
gfortran 4.7 compiled from trunk revision 171951 rejects an array constructor
with syntax:
[ derived_type_name:: ... ]
With -Wall --std=f2003 it accepts without complaint one of the form:
[ TYPE(derived_type_name):: ... ]
>From F2008 draft:
R468: array-constructor is (/ ac-spec /)
or lbracket ac-spec rbracket
R469: ac-spec is type-spec ::
or [type-spec ::] ac-value-list
R402: type-spec is intrinsic-type-spec
or derived-type-spec
R453: derived-type-spec is type-name [(type-param-spec-list)]
It looks like the compiler has confused a type-spec with a
declaration-type-spec, (which does use the TYPE keyword).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48478] Array-constructor with type-spec: reject valid/accept invalid
2011-04-06 11:51 [Bug fortran/48478] New: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid accepted ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
@ 2011-04-06 13:20 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-25 10:35 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-06 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48478
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords| |accepts-invalid,
| |rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed| |2011.04.06 13:20:35
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Summary|Valid array-constructor |Array-constructor with
|syntax rejected/invalid |type-spec: reject
|accepted |valid/accept invalid
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-06 13:20:35 UTC ---
Confirmed.
I first thought that it used to work properly (I cannot check at the moment),
but I now think that I mixed it up with "ALLOCATE ( type-spec :: ...)" which
has the the same syntax. Thus, the fix should be trivial: To use the same as
for allocate.
match.c's gfc_match_allocate has:
m = match_type_spec (&ts);
While array.c's gfc_match_array_constructor uses:
if (gfc_match_decl_type_spec (&ts, 0) == MATCH_YES)
(One should make sure that the array constructor also works in initialization
expressions, it might use a different code path.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/48478] Array-constructor with type-spec: reject valid/accept invalid
2011-04-06 11:51 [Bug fortran/48478] New: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid accepted ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
2011-04-06 13:20 ` [Bug fortran/48478] Array-constructor with type-spec: reject valid/accept invalid burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-25 10:35 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-25 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48478
Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed fixed in 4.9 and later.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-25 9:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-06 11:51 [Bug fortran/48478] New: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid accepted ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
2011-04-06 13:20 ` [Bug fortran/48478] Array-constructor with type-spec: reject valid/accept invalid burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-25 10:35 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).