From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5800 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2011 11:51:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 5782 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2011 11:51:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:51:13 +0000 From: "ian_harvey at bigpond dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/48478] New: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid accepted X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ian_harvey at bigpond dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00560.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48478 Summary: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid accepted Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ian_harvey@bigpond.com Created attachment 23898 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23898 Demonstrates valid and invalid syntax gfortran 4.7 compiled from trunk revision 171951 rejects an array constructor with syntax: [ derived_type_name:: ... ] With -Wall --std=f2003 it accepts without complaint one of the form: [ TYPE(derived_type_name):: ... ] >>From F2008 draft: R468: array-constructor is (/ ac-spec /) or lbracket ac-spec rbracket R469: ac-spec is type-spec :: or [type-spec ::] ac-value-list R402: type-spec is intrinsic-type-spec or derived-type-spec R453: derived-type-spec is type-name [(type-param-spec-list)] It looks like the compiler has confused a type-spec with a declaration-type-spec, (which does use the TYPE keyword).