From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23809 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2011 10:00:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 23799 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2011 10:00:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:00:31 +0000 From: "mikpe at it dot uu.se" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/48493] [ICE] [ARM] in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mikpe at it dot uu.se X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:00:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02155.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-24 09:59:58 UTC --- I've now bootstrapped and regtested the patch in #c5 on top of gcc-4.6-20110610 on an armv5tel-linux-gnueabi machine. (I couldn't get it to apply to trunk.) There were no build problems, it solved the test case, but there were a few testsuite regressions: +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/nodump-pr23073.c (internal compiler error) +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/nodump-pr23073.c (test for excess errors) /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/nodump-pr23073.c: In function 'C': /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/nodump-pr23073.c:19:1: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 7 6 8 3 (set (mem/s/c:BLK (reg/f:SI 134) [3 d+0 S16 A32]) (unspec:V2SI [ (reg:V2SI 135) ] 205)) /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/nodump-pr23073.c:16 -1 (nil)) /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/nodump-pr23073.c:19:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-34.c (internal compiler error) +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-34.c (test for excess errors) /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-34.c: In function 'main1': /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-34.c:31:1: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 41 40 42 3 (set (mem/s/c:BLK (reg/f:SI 173) [3 s+0 S16 A32]) (unspec:V8QI [ (reg:V8QI 175) ] 205)) /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-34.c:20 -1 (nil)) /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-34.c:31:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c (internal compiler error) +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c (test for excess errors) /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c: In function 'main1': /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c:41:1: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 24 23 25 3 (set (mem/s/c:BLK (reg/f:SI 168) [2 out+0 S64 A64]) (unspec:V2SI [ (reg:V2SI 174) ] 205)) /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c:28 -1 (nil)) /mnt/scratch/gcc-4.6-20110610/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c:41:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 +FAIL: gcc.target/arm/frame-pointer-1.c execution test The runtime test in foo() fails because p4 is 0xdeadbeef rather than 4.