From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22007 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2011 17:56:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 21996 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2011 17:56:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:56:30 +0000 From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug go/48501] New: 64bit-out.go, select5-out.go, tmp.go compilation times out X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: go X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00760.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501 Summary: 64bit-out.go, select5-out.go, tmp.go compilation times out Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go AssignedTo: ian@airs.com ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.* Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.* Build: sparc-sun-solaris2.* 3 go testcases time out while compiling on Solaris 2/SPARC: FAIL: ./64bit-out.go compilation, -O2 -g FAIL: ./select5-out.go compilation, -O2 -g FAIL: ./tmp.go compilation, -O2 -g E.g., compiling 64bit-out.go (an 1.3 MB source file) on an unloaded 1.35 GHz UltraSPARC IV+ takes real 4:13.59 user 4:12.51 sys 0.84 which is dangerously close to the default 300 s timeout. It's way worse on a 250 MHz MIPS R10k: real 17:17.42 user 17:12.24 sys 1.21 I thing such a test (haven't looked in more detail into the others) is way over the top.