public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/48620] New: many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta
@ 2011-04-15 12:49 zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2011-04-15 12:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/48620] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: zsojka at seznam dot cz @ 2011-04-15 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620

           Summary: many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32
                    -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: zsojka@seznam.cz
              Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
            Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu


Created attachment 23993
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23993
auto-reduced testcase

List of exec failures with:
make -j6 -k check-target
RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix/-m32/-fno-early-inlining/-fipa-pta'

FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/erase/1.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/1.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_multiset/erase/1.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/erase/1.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_map/erase/1.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_map/erase/24061-map.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_map/insert/map_range.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_map/insert/map_single.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/1.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/24061-multimap.cc execution
test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_multimap/insert/multimap_range.cc execution
test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_multimap/insert/multimap_single.cc execution
test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_multiset/erase/1.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_multiset/erase/24061-multiset.cc execution
test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_multiset/insert/multiset_range.cc execution
test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_multiset/insert/multiset_single.cc execution
test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_set/erase/1.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_set/erase/24061-set.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_set/insert/set_range.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/6_containers/unordered_set/insert/set_single.cc execution test

I wasn't able yet to get a nice testcase, the one attached has about 1000
lines. I am autoreducing other failures to see if there will be any suitable
for manual reduction...

Output:
$ g++ -m32 -std=gnu++0x -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta testcase.C -w
$ ./a.out 
a.out:
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/erase/1.cc:116:
void test01(): Assertion `m1.erase(m1.begin()) != m1.end()' failed.
Aborted


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/48620] many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta
  2011-04-15 12:49 [Bug tree-optimization/48620] New: many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta zsojka at seznam dot cz
@ 2011-04-15 12:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-02 12:37 ` j.breitbart at tum dot de
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-15 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.04.15 12:52:48
         Depends on|                            |47896
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-15 12:52:48 UTC ---
I suspect this might be the same as PR47896, so don't spend too much time
here until that is fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/48620] many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta
  2011-04-15 12:49 [Bug tree-optimization/48620] New: many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2011-04-15 12:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/48620] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-02 12:37 ` j.breitbart at tum dot de
  2015-04-02 12:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-02 13:09 ` j.breitbart at tum dot de
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: j.breitbart at tum dot de @ 2015-04-02 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620

Jens Breitbart <j.breitbart at tum dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |j.breitbart at tum dot de

--- Comment #2 from Jens Breitbart <j.breitbart at tum dot de> ---
Created attachment 35213
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35213&action=edit
Add _mask_range_hashing to hashtable_policy.h v1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/48620] many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta
  2011-04-15 12:49 [Bug tree-optimization/48620] New: many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2011-04-15 12:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/48620] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-02 12:37 ` j.breitbart at tum dot de
@ 2015-04-02 12:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-02 13:09 ` j.breitbart at tum dot de
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-02 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jens Breitbart from comment #2)
> Created attachment 35213 [details]
> Add _mask_range_hashing to hashtable_policy.h v1

Jens, I think you meant to attach this to PR65641, but as I said there, unless
you have a copyright assignment we can't use it anyway.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/48620] many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta
  2011-04-15 12:49 [Bug tree-optimization/48620] New: many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta zsojka at seznam dot cz
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-02 12:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-02 13:09 ` j.breitbart at tum dot de
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: j.breitbart at tum dot de @ 2015-04-02 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620

--- Comment #4 from Jens Breitbart <j.breitbart at tum dot de> ---
Yes, sorry, not sure how this happened.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-02 13:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-15 12:49 [Bug tree-optimization/48620] New: many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta zsojka at seznam dot cz
2011-04-15 12:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/48620] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-02 12:37 ` j.breitbart at tum dot de
2015-04-02 12:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-02 13:09 ` j.breitbart at tum dot de

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).