From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7156 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2011 19:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 7144 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2011 19:18:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:18:06 +0000 From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.1 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:18:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01784.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D48635 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler 2011-04-17 19:18:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Done. Fixed mainline and 4_6-branch. Looks good, thanks, but I just recognize that there is a library issue in regard to the template version. The FDIS correctly applied the corresponding proposal, but for some reason that is unclear, [unique.ptr.single.asgn] p. 6 describes the effects as "std::forward(u.get_deleter())". I verified with discussion with Howard that this should have been "std::forward(u.get_deleter())" instead, as it was suggested in http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#983