public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb
@ 2011-04-18 17:49 matt at use dot net
2011-04-19 9:45 ` [Bug debug/48670] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 more replies)
0 siblings, 13 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: matt at use dot net @ 2011-04-18 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Summary: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: matt@use.net
When compiling the attached preprocessed source with -O1 -ggdb, an explosion in
memory usage occurs. If I remove the -ggdb, the problem doesn't happen. This
seems to affect 32-bit targets more deeply:
g++ -march=pentium4 -ggdb -O1 -c bts.i
Oddly, the problem doesn't happen when running under valgrind. The problem does
happen under gdb, though, so that's something.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
@ 2011-04-19 9:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 23:55 ` matt at use dot net
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-19 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2011.04.19 09:44:21
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-19 09:44:21 UTC ---
Attachment missing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
2011-04-19 9:45 ` [Bug debug/48670] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-20 23:55 ` matt at use dot net
2011-04-20 23:59 ` matt at use dot net
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: matt at use dot net @ 2011-04-20 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
--- Comment #2 from Matt Hargett <matt at use dot net> 2011-04-20 23:54:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 24065
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24065
reduced test case, commandline to compile in bug comments
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
2011-04-19 9:45 ` [Bug debug/48670] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 23:55 ` matt at use dot net
@ 2011-04-20 23:59 ` matt at use dot net
2011-04-25 18:56 ` matt at use dot net
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: matt at use dot net @ 2011-04-20 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
--- Comment #3 from Matt Hargett <matt at use dot net> 2011-04-20 23:59:45 UTC ---
When compiling the example with 4.5.2, memory usage peaks at around 216meg on
my Ubuntu 10.10/amd64 machine. With 4.6, it peaks at 3.2gig(!)
In the non-reduced test case, it gets up to 7 gig before the machine (which has
9gig total) starts swapping to the point where I have to kill the process.
Interestingly (maybe), a GCC 4.6 snapshot from early march doesn't exhibit the
problem as badly. It peaks at 'only' 636meg.
PS: Sorry for the missing attachment, not sure why attach isn't working upon
initial submission...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-20 23:59 ` matt at use dot net
@ 2011-04-25 18:56 ` matt at use dot net
2011-04-28 23:16 ` [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: matt at use dot net @ 2011-04-25 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
--- Comment #4 from Matt Hargett <matt at use dot net> 2011-04-25 18:55:36 UTC ---
ping? Anything else you need from me on this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-25 18:56 ` matt at use dot net
@ 2011-04-28 23:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-29 6:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-28 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-28 23:16 ` [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-29 6:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-10 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-29 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-29 06:17:27 UTC ---
Why do you use -ggdb? STABS is very obsolete debugging format, I see no reason
why it should be used on targets that support DWARF{2,3,4}.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-29 6:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-10 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-12 13:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-10 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-10 10:34:52 UTC ---
Anyway, most likely PR48190, i.e.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=171655
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-05-10 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-12 13:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 16:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-12 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-06-12 13:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-27 16:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-26 17:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |4.6.2
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 12:32:52 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.1 is being released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-06-27 16:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-10-26 17:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-01 14:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-10-26 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-26 17:13:41 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.2 is being released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-10-26 17:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-01 14:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-03 23:18 ` matt at use dot net
2012-12-04 0:03 ` matt at use dot net
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-01 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-01 14:38:39 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.3 is being released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-01 14:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-03 23:18 ` matt at use dot net
2012-12-04 0:03 ` matt at use dot net
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: matt at use dot net @ 2012-12-03 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
--- Comment #10 from Matt Hargett <matt at use dot net> 2012-12-03 23:17:22 UTC ---
I no longer have access to the source tree that exhibited this problem, but it
was likely the same as the qemu issue referenced earlier. Feel free to resolve
as fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-03 23:18 ` matt at use dot net
@ 2012-12-04 0:03 ` matt at use dot net
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: matt at use dot net @ 2012-12-04 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Matt Hargett <matt at use dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #11 from Matt Hargett <matt at use dot net> 2012-12-04 00:02:52 UTC ---
Marking it resolved myself.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-04 0:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-18 17:49 [Bug debug/48670] New: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb matt at use dot net
2011-04-19 9:45 ` [Bug debug/48670] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 23:55 ` matt at use dot net
2011-04-20 23:59 ` matt at use dot net
2011-04-25 18:56 ` matt at use dot net
2011-04-28 23:16 ` [Bug debug/48670] [4.6 regression] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb on a class with many members rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-29 6:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-10 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-12 13:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 16:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-26 17:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-01 14:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-03 23:18 ` matt at use dot net
2012-12-04 0:03 ` matt at use dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).