public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ?
@ 2011-04-19  6:55 ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-19  8:45 ` [Bug preprocessor/48677] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (18 more replies)
  0 siblings, 19 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-19  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

           Summary: cpp.exe broken ?
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: P3
         Component: preprocessor
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: ralphengels@gmail.com


hello im not sure if it has happened to others but im running head first into
something really annoying with the new gcc-4.6.0 package.

i maintain two packages for i686-w64-mingw32 and x86_64-w64-mingw32.

latest version i build was 4.5.2 and it works flawlessly but i was kinda
looking forward to the new version with plugin support for mingw.

unfortunatly it seems something broke with the changes causing cpp.exe to crash
when executed (i686-w64-mingw32) a quick run through gdb points to lbasename.c 

in this section   

  /* Skip over a possible disk name.  */
  if (ISALPHA(name[0]) && name[1] == ':') // crashes here
    name += 2;

the x86_64-w64-mingw32 builds cpp.exe doesnt crash but outputs nothing.

i noticed a lot of changes in the libiberty code so maybe a bug ?

heres the commands i use for bootstrapping it allthough i tried several
switches.

../src/gcc-4.6.0/configure \
--build=i686-w64-mingw32 --enable-libgomp \
--enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran,objc,obj-c++ \
--enable-lto --enable-checking=release \
--disable-werror --disable-werror-allways \
--disable-win32-registry --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs \
--enable-fully-dynamic-string --prefix=/mingw32 \
--with-sysroot=/mingw32 --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as \
--disable-multilib \
CFLAGS="-mtune=generic" \
BOOT_CFLAGS="-mtune=generic" \
CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-mtune=generic" \
CXXFLAGS="-mthreads -mtune=generic" \
BOOT_CXXFLAGS="-mthreads -mtune=generic" \
CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-mthreads -mtune=generic" \
LFLAGS="-flto -fwhopr=2 -s" \
BOOT_LFLAGS="-flto -fwhopr=2 -s" \
LFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-flto -fwhopr=2 -s" && make

btw im on win7 64.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-19  8:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-04-19  9:42 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-19  8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Build|                            |i686-w64-mingw32

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-19 08:45:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> 
> unfortunatly it seems something broke with the changes causing cpp.exe to crash
> when executed (i686-w64-mingw32) a quick run through gdb points to lbasename.c 

Does it crash in all cases, whatever arguments you give it, or only sometimes?

> in this section   
> 
>   /* Skip over a possible disk name.  */
>   if (ISALPHA(name[0]) && name[1] == ':') // crashes here
>     name += 2;

Why does it crash? is name null? is it less than two characters?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-19  8:45 ` [Bug preprocessor/48677] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-19  9:42 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-20  8:48 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-19  9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #2 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-04-19 09:41:45 UTC ---
in all cases im afraid.

i tried skipping over null names but the crash persists, no output either i
just get the usual windows box with cpp.exe has stopped working.

the reason why i noticed it in the first place was that codeblocks popped a
warning about cpp not working every time it tried to parse from my project
files.

tbh. im not sure where the bug started from. i remember doing a build of an
earlier svn version before release and there cpp was working but i cant
remember the version number.

i can upload the executable if you want to give it a try with debugging.

ralph


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-19  8:45 ` [Bug preprocessor/48677] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-04-19  9:42 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-20  8:48 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-20  9:10 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-20  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #3 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-04-20 08:48:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 24055
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24055
screenshot of gdb output

screenshot of gdb's output.

hope it helps.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-20  8:48 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-20  9:10 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-04-20  9:31 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-20  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-20 09:10:21 UTC ---
gdb's output is just text, wouldn't it have been easier to paste 4 lines of
text instead of a 700KB screenshot showing your entire desktop?!

You never answered my question about whether name is null. That screenshot
shows it has the value 0xbaadf00d which indicates uninitialized memory from the
Windows heap


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-20  9:10 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-20  9:31 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-20  9:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-20  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #5 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-04-20 09:30:51 UTC ---
sorry about that its just i have no idea how to copy the text from gdb's
console window.

about checking if name = null im not sure how i should go about it ?

something like if (name[0] == NULL) print some error ?.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-20  9:31 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-20  9:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-04-20  9:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-20  9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-20 09:32:56 UTC ---
it's not null. it has the value 0xbaadf00d.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-20  9:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-20  9:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-04-20 10:00 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-20  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-20 09:34:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> sorry about that its just i have no idea how to copy the text from gdb's
> console window.

right-click, choose "Select All", hit Enter


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-20  9:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-20 10:00 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-20 15:18 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-20 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #8 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-04-20 10:00:24 UTC ---
my bad i ran cpp.exe by pulling it directly into gdb (had to use a command
prompt).

heres the output.

-    0x417f90    <lbasename>:        mov    0x4(%esp),%eax
-    0x417f94    <lbasename+4>:        movzbl (%eax),%edx // breaks here
-    0x417f97    <lbasename+7>:        movzbl %dl,%ecx
    0x417f9a    <lbasename+10>:        movzwl 0x445b20(%ecx,%ecx,1),%ecx
-    0x417fa2    <lbasename+18>:        and    $0x88,%ecx
-    0x417fa8    <lbasename+24>:        je     0x417fb0 <lbasename+32>
-    0x417faa    <lbasename+26>:        cmpb   $0x3a,0x1(%eax)
-    0x417fae    <lbasename+30>:        je     0x417fe0 <lbasename+80>
-    0x417fb0    <lbasename+32>:        test   %dl,%dl
-    0x417fb2    <lbasename+34>:        je     0x417fcc <lbasename+60>
-    0x417fb4    <lbasename+36>:        lea    0x1(%eax),%ecx
-    0x417fb7    <lbasename+39>:        cmp    $0x5c,%dl
-    0x417fba    <lbasename+42>:        je     0x417fd0 <lbasename+64>
-    0x417fbc    <lbasename+44>:        cmp    $0x2f,%dl
-    0x417fbf    <lbasename+47>:        je     0x417fd0 <lbasename+64>
-    0x417fc1    <lbasename+49>:        add    $0x1,%ecx
-    0x417fc4    <lbasename+52>:        movzbl -0x1(%ecx),%edx
-    0x417fc8    <lbasename+56>:        test   %dl,%dl
-    0x417fca    <lbasename+58>:        jne    0x417fb7 <lbasename+39>
-    0x417fcc    <lbasename+60>:        repz ret 
-    0x417fce    <lbasename+62>:        xchg   %ax,%ax
-    0x417fd0    <lbasename+64>:        mov    %ecx,%eax
-    0x417fd2    <lbasename+66>:        add    $0x1,%ecx
-    0x417fd5    <lbasename+69>:        movzbl -0x1(%ecx),%edx
-    0x417fd9    <lbasename+73>:        test   %dl,%dl
-    0x417fdb    <lbasename+75>:        jne    0x417fb7 <lbasename+39>
-    0x417fdd    <lbasename+77>:        jmp    0x417fcc <lbasename+60>
-    0x417fdf    <lbasename+79>:        nop
-    0x417fe0    <lbasename+80>:        movzbl 0x2(%eax),%edx
-    0x417fe4    <lbasename+84>:        add    $0x2,%eax
-    0x417fe7    <lbasename+87>:        jmp    0x417fb0 <lbasename+32>
-    0x417fe9    <lbasename+89>:        nop
-    0x417fea    <lbasename+90>:        nop
-    0x417feb    <lbasename+91>:        nop
-    0x417fec    <lbasename+92>:        nop
-    0x417fed    <lbasename+93>:        nop
-    0x417fee    <lbasename+94>:        nop
-    0x417fef    <lbasename+95>:        nop

in code

     179    int mainCRTStartup (void)
-    180    {
     181      int ret = 255;
     182    #ifdef __SEH__
     183      asm ("\t.l_start:\n"
     184        "\t.seh_handler __C_specific_handler, @except\n"
     185        "\t.seh_handlerdata\n"
     186        "\t.long 1\n"
     187        "\t.rva .l_start, .l_end, _gnu_exception_handler ,.l_end\n"
     188        "\t.text"
     189        );
     190    #endif

im pretty new to gdb so bear with me.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-20 10:00 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-20 15:18 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-20 22:49 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-20 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #9 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-04-20 15:17:40 UTC ---
if its any help i noticed that cpp.exe seems to have a dependency on
libstdc++6.dll "somewhere" since dependency walker says it doesnt but it barfs
pretty loudly if its not there. 

strange thing is the libstdc++6.dll it wants is the gcc-4.6.0 one (which isnt
even built yet) so i had to copy an earlier build to path for it to pick it up.

ill try a static build to see if it still throws the error.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-20 15:18 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-20 22:49 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-21 15:45 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-20 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #10 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-04-20 22:48:54 UTC ---
hmm it seems im getting closer to iron out where the bug appears. 

     3880    #if defined(TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT_RELOCATABLE) && !defined(VMS)
     3881      /* If the normal TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT is inside of $exec_prefix,
     3882         then consider it to relocate with the rest of the GCC
installation
     3883         if GCC_EXEC_PREFIX is set.
     3884         ``make_relative_prefix'' is not compiled for VMS, so don't
call it.  */
-    3885      if (target_system_root && !target_system_root_changed &&
gcc_exec_prefix)
     3886        {
-    3887          char *tmp_prefix = get_relative_prefix
(decoded_options[0].arg, // decoded_options throws the BADF00D according to gdb
     3888                              standard_bindir_prefix,
     3889                              target_system_root);
-    3890          if (tmp_prefix && access_check (tmp_prefix, F_OK) == 0)
     3891        {
-    3892          target_system_root = tmp_prefix;
-    3893          target_system_root_changed = 1;
     3894        }
     3895        }
     3896    #endif

if i do a memory dump on the call to decoded_options in insight the first 10
registers show {0xbaadf00d} funny name btw. 

maybe a bad pointer somewhere ?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-20 22:49 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-21 15:45 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-04-21 16:18 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-21 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #11 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-04-21 15:45:13 UTC ---
ok it seems to be related to sysroots i tried compiling without --with-sysroot
and cpp.exe works then. 

question would then be if its an error on my part ? i use sysinternals junction
to create the /mingw32/mingw directory for sysroot as a reparse point but i
tried just copying the relevant lib and include dirs instead and its still the
same error so im not sure.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-21 15:45 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-04-21 16:18 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-05-15  3:15 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-04-21 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #12 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-04-21 16:18:17 UTC ---
ok it works ! but damn this is strange i had to encase the path to the sysroot
directory in quotes and use the windows path instead of the posix path variant.

../src/gcc-4.6.0/configure \
--build=i686-w64-mingw32 --enable-libgomp \
--enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran,objc,obj-c++ \
--enable-lto --enable-checking=release \
--disable-werror --disable-werror-allways \
--disable-win32-registry --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs \
--enable-fully-dynamic-string --prefix=/mingw32 \
--with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as \
--with-sysroot="c:/codeblocks/mingw32" --disable-multilib \
CFLAGS="-mtune=generic" \
BOOT_CFLAGS="-mtune=generic" \
CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-mtune=generic" \
CXXFLAGS="-mthreads -mtune=generic" \
BOOT_CXXFLAGS="-mthreads -mtune=generic" \
CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-mthreads -mtune=generic" \
LFLAGS="-flto -fwhopr=2 -s" \
BOOT_LFLAGS="-flto -fwhopr=2 -s" \
LFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-flto -fwhopr=2 -s" && make -j8 && make DESTDIR=/e/gcc32
install


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-21 16:18 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-05-15  3:15 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-05-15 11:39 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-05-15  3:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #13 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-05-15 01:37:13 UTC ---
took me quite a while but i found the bug.

in gcc/cppspec.c

  /* If we don't need to edit the command line, we can bail early.  */
  new_argc = argc + need_E + read_stdin + !!lang_c_here + !!lang_S_here;

  if (new_argc == argc && !o_here) return;

  new_decoded_options = XNEWVEC (struct cl_decoded_option, new_argc);

  /* old one */
//new_decoded_options[0] = new_decoded_options[0];

  /* new one */
  new_decoded_options[0] = decoded_options[0];

i figured it was a bug in command processing after a while so i compared with
an older working release and this was what seemed out of place.

can you confirm this ?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-15  3:15 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-05-15 11:39 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-05-15 11:55 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-05-15 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

ralphengels@gmail.com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #14 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-05-15 11:20:25 UTC ---
well cpp seems to work now so im changing it to fixed unless someone disagress
?.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-15 11:39 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-05-15 11:55 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
  2011-05-15 12:48 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu.se @ 2011-05-15 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |mikpe at it dot uu.se

--- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2011-05-15 11:32:40 UTC ---
Looks like a typo introduced by r163459.  Author CC:d.

The typo is still present on trunk so I don't think you should have closed this
as fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-15 11:55 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
@ 2011-05-15 12:48 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
  2011-05-16 18:50 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ralphengels at gmail dot com @ 2011-05-15 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

ralphengels@gmail.com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

--- Comment #16 from ralphengels at gmail dot com <ralphengels at gmail dot com> 2011-05-15 12:29:29 UTC ---
ok ill leave it open.

still one bug im running in to but not sure its related to this one.

the 64 bit build of 4.6.0 cannot bootstrap itself collect2 ld error 116.

the 32 bit one works fine though, i seem to recall hearing it being related to
a binutils bug but not sure.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-15 12:48 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
@ 2011-05-16 18:50 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-05-16 21:58 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-05-16 22:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-16 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #17 from Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-16 18:34:34 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Mon May 16 18:34:31 2011
New Revision: 173801

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173801
Log:
    PR preprocessor/48677
    * cppspec.c (lang_specific_driver): Set new_decoded_options[0]
    from decoded_options[0], not from itself.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/cppspec.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-16 18:50 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-16 21:58 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-05-16 22:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-16 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

--- Comment #18 from Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-16 21:23:18 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Mon May 16 21:23:14 2011
New Revision: 173808

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173808
Log:
    PR preprocessor/48677
    * cppspec.c (lang_specific_driver): Set new_decoded_options[0]
    from decoded_options[0], not from itself.

Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cppspec.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?
  2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-16 21:58 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-16 22:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-16 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677

Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.1

--- Comment #19 from Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-16 22:09:38 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.6.1 and 4.7.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-16 22:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-19  6:55 [Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ? ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-04-19  8:45 ` [Bug preprocessor/48677] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-19  9:42 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-04-20  8:48 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-04-20  9:10 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20  9:31 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-04-20  9:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20  9:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-20 10:00 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-04-20 15:18 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-04-20 22:49 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-04-21 15:45 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-04-21 16:18 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-05-15  3:15 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-05-15 11:39 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-05-15 11:55 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2011-05-15 12:48 ` ralphengels at gmail dot com
2011-05-16 18:50 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-16 21:58 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-16 22:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).