From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25189 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2011 16:15:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 25177 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2011 16:15:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:15:00 +0000 From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/48713] Error: invalid instruction suffix for push Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg01938.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48713 Kai Tietz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2011-12-17 16:14:28 UTC --- Yes, this issue happens if you are mixing 32-bit binutils and 64-bit gcc. You can test, if you have actually downloaded an native 64-bit Windows gcc compiler, by specifying on command for compile only the option '-m32'. I assume it will be successful then. I've tested your module compilation by i686-w64-mingw32 fortran-compiler and it translates without flaws.