From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-354451-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19754 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2011 15:01:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 19745 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2011 15:01:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_JV,TW_SG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:01:34 +0000
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-48720-4-wjWfe1MPob@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48720-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48720-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:01:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg02355.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720

--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2011-04-22 15:00:50 UTC ---
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:47:03PM +0000, jvdelisle at frontier dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
> 
> --- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-22 12:46:16 UTC ---
> On 04/21/2011 09:08 PM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- snip ---
> >>
> >> I think we are not handling the 'q' as any more than an exponent marker. 'e'
> >> works just as well.
> >
> > Oh my, is gfortran accepting 1.1q0.  Let's stop that
> > right now!  Use 1.1e0_16.
> >
> 
> Agree, and its in the front end somewhere.
> 

It's match_real_constant in primary.c.

I suppose that question is do we want to disallow q.