From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12414 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2011 15:10:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 12400 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2011 15:10:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_GM,TW_LR,TW_RW,TW_WX,TW_XR X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:10:33 +0000 From: "kayhayen at gmx dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/48740] Raw C++0x strings and trigraphs mix badly X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kayhayen at gmx dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.1 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:10:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg02442.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D48740 --- Comment #13 from Kay Hayen 2011-04-23 15:10:32= UTC --- Oh, it occured to me something that I could test: [~]> g++-4.6 -c --std=3Dc++0x testcase.cpp -Wall -Werror testcase.cpp:3:17: error: unterminated raw string testcase.cpp:3:15: error: expected primary-expression at end of input testcase.cpp:3:15: error: expected =E2=80=98,=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98;=E2=80= =99 at end of input [~]> /usr/bin/g++-4.6 -c --std=3Dc++0x testcase.cpp -Wall -Werror [~]> which g++-4.6 /usr/local/bin//g++-4.6 [~]> ls -l /usr/local/bin//g++-4.6 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 15 7. Jan 15:12 /usr/local/bin//g++-4.6 -> /usr/bin/ccache So, it's a bug of ccache or the way it interacts with g++ How on earth exactly do I apologize. In no way had I thought it possible th= at ccache would ever cause a problem, not was I aware or near sure if it is us= ed at all. If you close this bug as invalid, I will take it to ccache upstream= or Debian. Yours, Kay Hayen