public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "john at johnmaddock dot co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-48760-4-FgHtzir64V@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-48760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760

--- Comment #7 from John Maddock <john at johnmaddock dot co.uk> 2011-04-25 17:21:15 UTC ---
Sorry to be dumb, but doesn't the result of the C code violate section G.5.2 in
C99 - which is to say that no matter what the value of the imaginary part of an
expression, it never changes the real part - even if that is a NaN?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-25 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-25 11:19 [Bug libstdc++/48760] New: " john at johnmaddock dot co.uk
2011-04-25 12:08 ` [Bug middle-end/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-25 12:42 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-25 13:23 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-25 16:02 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-04-25 16:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/48760] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-25 16:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-25 16:47 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-25 17:22 ` john at johnmaddock dot co.uk [this message]
2011-04-25 17:58 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-25 18:12 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-25 21:41 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-25 22:05 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-26  8:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-26 10:08 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-26 14:18 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-26 14:32 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-04-26 14:56 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-26 15:07 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-04-27  0:04 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-27  1:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-27  3:59 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-27  9:16 ` [Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-27 13:14 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-27 14:06 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-27 21:41 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-28  1:54 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-28 10:53 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-28 11:02 ` [Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-29 23:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-04-29 23:25 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-29 23:54 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-30 18:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-05-02  8:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-02  9:44 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-48760-4-FgHtzir64V@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).