From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2203 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2012 23:51:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 1999 invoked by uid 48); 7 Nov 2012 23:50:11 -0000 From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/48806] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403 Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:51:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00683.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48806 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-07 23:50:09 UTC --- I've tried to reproduce the test case of this PR on rev 193240 (4.8) with the change in rev 185714 reverted. It seems that this test case doesn't trigger the error any more. However, the test case of PR 48596 does still blow up (with reverted change of rev 185714). Is it OK to close this PR without adding the test case to the test suite?