public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/48830] [4.6 regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper FP reg in SImode
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-48830-4-aPDHWhz0E1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-48830-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830

--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-19 15:28:24 UTC ---
> I see something similar with gcc 4.5.3 when compiling mrtg:
> 
> ./src/rateup.c:1136:1: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints:
> (insn 11219 11218 3096 307 ./src/rateup.c:913 (set (mem/c:SI (reg:DI 2 %g2) [23
> %sfp+-10660 S4 A32])
>         (reg:SI 65 %f33 [+4 ])) 50 {*movsi_insn} (nil))
> ./src/rateup.c:1136:1: internal compiler error: in
> reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:396
> 
> (this has originally been reported as http://gnats.netbsd.org/46719)
> 
> Is this the samme issue? Any chance of a fix for the 4.5 branch?

This indeed looks like the same issue.  But no fix is planned for 4.5.x (the
branch is now closed) or 4.6.x (too risky).  The workaround is usually trivial
(lower the optimization level).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-19 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-30  1:36 [Bug target/48830] New: [4.4/4.6 Regression] unrecognized insn storing fp (simd) reg in SImode to stack hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-30  1:56 ` [Bug target/48830] " hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-30 12:59 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2011-05-01  0:36 ` [Bug target/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper fp " hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-01  0:40 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-01  1:51 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-01  1:52 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-01  8:47 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-01 11:14 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-01 11:26 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-05-01 12:51 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-29 20:14 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-30 18:33 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/48830] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-01 19:47 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-01 20:28 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-12 13:36 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper FP reg in SImode rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 16:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-25 14:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-26 18:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-01 15:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-19 13:56 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/48830] [4.6 " martin at netbsd dot org
2012-07-19 15:28 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2013-04-12 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-48830-4-aPDHWhz0E1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).