From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-360532-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4174 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2011 08:37:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 4013 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2011 08:37:38 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:37:25 +0000
From: "mikpe at it dot uu.se" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikpe at it dot uu.se
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-48835-4-6TOB2Lxo5T@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48835-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48835-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:37:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02058.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835

--- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2011-06-23 08:36:33 UTC ---
Status update: I have a nice stable gcc-4.1.2 with gnat that has bootstrapped
itself through approx 10 generations natively on m68k-linux, and the final
working patch kit is quite small.

I forward-ported the 4.1.2 patch kit to 4.4.6, added one tweak (don't set
DECL_IS_MALLOC on malloc_decl since it doesn't return a pointer type with the
kit), but that failed near the end of stage2 with the same assertion as in #c8.

So I now intend to go back a do full bootstraps also with the intermediate 4.2
and 4.3 releases.  That in turn will require some digging to locate whatever
m68k-specific patches I'll need for those releases.