From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23196 invoked by alias); 2 May 2011 20:38:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 23045 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2011 20:38:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:37:53 +0000 From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/48847] New: Wrong "unused parameter" warning with interface block X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 20:38:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48847 Summary: Wrong "unused parameter" warning with interface block Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org Original test case by Ondrej Certik from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-04/msg00297.html Reduced test case: module foo contains function f(g) interface real function g() end function g end interface real :: f f = g() end function f end module foo ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Warn> gfortran -c -Wunused-parameter b.f90 b.f90:3:0: warning: unused parameter 'g' [-Wunused-parameter] Same warning in 4.4, so probably not a regression.