From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-356302-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28821 invoked by alias); 11 May 2011 21:14:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 28808 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2011 21:14:13 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:14:00 +0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/48970] New: Inaccurate comments for processor_costs
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-48970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:22:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00969.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48970

           Summary: Inaccurate comments for processor_costs
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
                CC: ubizjak@gmail.com
            Target: x86


i386.h has

struct processor_costs {
...
  const int sse_load[3];        /* cost of loading SSE register
                                   in SImode, DImode and TImode*/
  const int sse_store[3];       /* cost of storing SSE register
                                   in SImode, DImode and TImode*/

But i386.c has
 if (SSE_CLASS_P (regclass))
    {
      int index;
      switch (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode))
        {     
          case 4:
            index = 0;
            break;
          case 8:
            index = 1;
            break;
          case 16:
            index = 2;
            break;
          default:
            return 100;
        }     
      if (in == 2) 
        return MAX (ix86_cost->sse_load [index], ix86_cost->sse_store [index]);
      return in ? ix86_cost->sse_load [index] : ix86_cost->sse_store [index];
    }

SImode, DImode nor TImode aren't used to compute costs.