From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25386 invoked by alias); 16 May 2011 06:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 25377 invoked by uid 22791); 16 May 2011 06:14:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 06:14:06 +0000 From: "npozar at quick dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/49001] GCC uses VMOVAPS/PD AVX instructions to access stack variables that are not 32-byte aligned X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: npozar at quick dot cz X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 07:22:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg01228.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49001 --- Comment #3 from Norbert Pozar 2011-05-16 06:05:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please provide testcase that can be compiled without changes. See [1]. I'm sorry about this. > Probably mingw64 specific problem... CC added. Thank you for your time to test the code on linux. I was worried that this might be mingw64 specific. (In reply to comment #2) > Stack alignment isn't supported on Windows. Since this bug effectively prevents using 256bit AVX instructions when compiling for Windows using GCC, I was wondering if there are any plans to support the stack alignment. It seems that simply adding andq $-32, %rsp to the function prologue would fix this. Or would it be feasible to replace VMOVAPS by unaligned VMOVUPS when accessing the stack?